Friday, 9 August 2019

VERITATIS GAUDIUM


INTRODUCTION

Veritatis Gaudium is an apostolic constitution of Pope Francis on ecclesiastical universities and faculties. This constitution which translates to ‘the joy of truth’ was signed by the Pontiff on the 8th of December 2017 and was promulgated on the 29th of January 2018.  Following in the footsteps of similar documents, this document stipulates some guidelines to be followed and some rules to be applied in studies in an ecclesiastical institution, with special regards to philosophy and theology. There is a basic need for the acquisition of knowledge. In knowledge we get in touch with the truth. However quest for knowledge should be within the perspective of our Christian belief. In other words we must not seek a knowledge that contradicts our Christian belief. Thus Benedict XVI in his Encyclical Letter Caritas in veritate, explicated that the truth from a Christian perspective cannot be considered apart from love. Therefore the defending and promoting of the truth is a basic form of charity. However the truth is more than knowledge. This is why the Congregation for Catholic Education on the preamble of the decree on the reform of ecclesiastical studies of philosophy calls upon Universities

First of all, to take up the challenge of exercising, developing and defending a rationality with ‘broader horizons’, showing that “it again becomes possible to enlarge the area of our rationality, to link theology, philosophy and science between them in full respect  of their reciprocal autonomy, but also in the awareness of the intrinsic unity that holds them together.” On an institutional level, to rediscover “this great logos”, “this breadth of reason”, is precisely “the great task of the university.”[1]

SECTION III: FACUALTY OF PHILOSOPHY

The paragraph one of the article eighty-one makes clear that within ecclesiastical institutes and faculties, philosophical investigations must agree with the rules and principles of science, and should be based on an efficient philosophy. In the number three of his Encyclical Letter Fides et ratio, “Pope John Paul II wished to emphasize the need for philosophy, so as to advance in the knowledge of the truth and to render earthly existence ever more human. In fact, philosophy “is directly concerned with asking the question of life’s meaning and sketching an answer to it.’” This question arises both from the wonder that man experiences in his encounter with others and with the cosmos, and from the painful and tragic experiences that assail his life. Philosophical knowledge, therefore, is seen as being ‘one of the noblest of human tasks’.[2] However, proffering solutions to philosophical problems must be done based on a systematic method that is strictly scientific and must be hinged on a constantly renewed and updated philosophy. In other words, those responsible for imparting philosophical knowledge in students must embark on a legacy of never staying in the dark; they should always seek to update themselves in order not to provide the students with an outdated knowledge and they too must ensure that enquiries into the different subject matters of philosophy is not taking with levity on the part of the students. Its search and enquiries must not be outside the scope of natural reason and is to be in accordance with the Christian view of the world, of man and of God. It should appropriately represent the relationship of philosophy and theology. Philosophy and theology are not courses in mutual opposition rather they work in collaboration. As the two courses systematically represent reason and faith, they both work together; thus where reason ends faith begins. Philosophy is the handmaid of theology just as exemplified in the fides et ratio of Pope John Paul II. This fact should be brought to the consciousness of the students. The connection between philosophy and theology should not be lost. This is why John Paul II plainly stated that a philosophical formation that is open to faith is encouraged. However philosophy and theology must not be confused or disconnected.

The second paragraph stresses on continuity. Students should be prepared to be able to teach and impart knowledge. This is to say that, after being taught, they should be able to pass on the knowledge by teaching others. However they have to impart an updated knowledge. They also should be made fit to assume intellectual post and be equipped as promoters of Christian culture in dialogue. Foremost is to be considered the Christian cultural and traditional heritage. Just as the Pope said in Vatican City, “Catholic university programs in philosophy, theology and canon law — especially those designed for future priests — must be marked by fidelity to church tradition, academic rigor and an awareness of the challenges to belief in the modern world”.[3] However, as laid down in the article eighty-two, the study curriculum in an ecclesiastical institute or faculty of philosophy should include for the first cycle which is the first three years or six semesters a grounded and essential introduction and a systematic interpretation and explanation of the different parts of philosophy with special references to the world, Man and God. This is to include the history of philosophy; where and how it all started, and an introduction to scientific methodology of research.

This article affirms the stipulations of the number 15 of the decree on the training of priests which states that philosophical subjects should be taught in a way that students are led gradually through a solid and consistent knowledge of man, the world and God, and that students should rely on the philosophical patrimony which is forever valid, but should also take account of modern philosophical studies especially those with greater influence, as well as recent progress in science. Correctly understanding the modern mind, students will be prepared to enter into dialogue with their contemporaries.[4]

The second cycle should be a period for specification and specialization. This is a period of emphasizing and focusing on ones areas of particular interest. For example philosophy as an academic discipline is made up of different branches which may include epistemology, ethics, metaphysics and logic, and within each of these branches are different epochs and subject matters of specific considerations. Within this cycle, for a period of two years or four semesters a more profound and particularized consideration of philosophical sectors should be imparted considering special disciplines and seminars as a useful tool in this enterprise. Students should be well animated in the areas of their specialization by conducting seminars for them.

The third cycle which is to extend to at least a time period of three years is dedicated to equipping a great mind and ensuring the attainment of philosophical maturity. In other words, in this level in philosophical studies, the student must have risen above the level of being a philosophical amateur; this is a level of acquiring professionalism in the field of philosophy. Ascertaining the maturity of the mind is done by means of writing a doctoral dissertation. Philosophical maturity is very important as John Paul II in his Fides et ratio emphasized the need for philosophy and its importance in advancement in the knowledge of the truth and adding to our human existence. However attaining philosophical maturity here, can also be in the light of the number eleven of the Decree on the Reform of Ecclesiastical Studies of Philosophy of the Congregation for Catholic Education which states that the students in Ecclesiastical Faculties acquire a solid philosophy to make it possible to think, know and reason with precision, and also to dialogue with everyone incisively and fearlessly.

The article eighty-three explains that each cycle of study ends with a degree. This is to certify that a candidate have qualified under merits within the particular standard of each cycle and have acquired the educational award due to that particular level of studies. The first cycle ends with a degree of baccalaureate while the second cycle ends with a specialized Licentiate and the third cycle ends with a doctorate. However as stated in the article thirty five of this document, Ecclesiastical Universities or Faculties which are canonically erected or approved, the academic degrees are given by authority of the Holy See.[5]

The article eighty-four talks about the requirements for enrolment into the first cycle of the faculty of philosophy. This demands that the student must have completed preliminary studies necessary for enrolment. Within the Nigerian context, for a student to enroll into a university requires that the student completes his secondary school education, write and pass his WAEC or any other valid secondary school graduation exam. However the article goes on to add that faculties in their own statutes should determine what other requirements would be necessary for enrolment. For instance a student who studied art in his secondary school education will not possibly be admitted to study core science in the university, and also there is a degree of grades required for enrolment which is at least five credit passes.

For students who completed the first cycle of the regular philosophical courses in a theological faculty, due account must be taken in noting the courses they offered during the particular course of studies in case if he want to continue philosophical studies in order to obtain baccalaureate. For instance when a student that studied philosophy in saints Peter and Paul Bodija goes for theology in a different seminary, he would necessarily have to start from theology two because he had already offered the courses that make up for his theology one.

CONCLUSION: These articles dealt with academic processes and procedures, specially highlighting studies in philosophy. This is a stipulated guideline of what is expected in a particular level of study and what is to be achieved after the level is completed. However, all these should be in line with the faith.

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CONSECRATED PERSONS AND THE LAITY


THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CONSECRATED PERSONS AND THE LAITY

INTRODUCTION

The church is a family of God’s children; made up of the Christ’s faithful. Christ is the Head and we are the members of the one Body, living in deep communion with one another. Within the Christian faithful are the consecrated persons. However, the ministry of the church is entrusted to the whole Christian faithful; this implies that there is a basic necessity for mutual correlation and collaboration for the work of the church. The church is a communion and the ministry is collaborative. The ministry of the Church is not carried out in isolation. However, the Church is a mystery in which communion and mission are profoundly interconnected.

The faithful are different parts of Christ body which is the church. Each finds it fulfillment by being part of the whole. However, the different states of life and vocation within the church contribute to the strengthening of the communion and mission of the church as a whole.[1] Each vocation is given for the good of the church and her mission. However, in this paper I am going to focus on the relationship between the consecrated persons and the laity.

CONCEPTUAL CLARIFICATION

For a proper approach and understanding of the subject matter of this paper, I would like to make a conceptual clarification or a definition of term to aid a better understanding of the paper.

WHO ARE THE CONSECRATED PERSONS?

The consecrated persons are Christian faithful who have willingly given their selves in radical response to the mission of the church, through and within a specific institute of consecrated life, professing, embracing and living out the evangelical counsels of chastity, poverty and obedience. Therefore a consecrated person is a Christian faithful who has set himself apart through the profession of the evangelical counsels, to follow Christ more closely under the action of the Holy Spirit.

WHO ARE THE LAITY?

The Laity are members of the Church (the community of the baptized) who belong neither to the Clergy nor Consecrated Persons. However, this is a negative definition of the laity in the past because it only said who the laity are not and said nothing about who they are. However all thanks to the Christifideles Laici, the Post-Synodal Exhortation of John Paul II on the Vocation and Mission of the Lay Faithful in the Church and in the World, which provided a positive definition of the laity. The laity by virtue of their baptism are Sons and daughters of the Father in Jesus Christ, members of the body of Christ, the Church, holy and living temples of the Holy Spirit, sharers in the priestly, prophetic and kingly mission of Jesus Christ, and persons called to a holiness which they achieve through their involvement and participation in secular realities. The lay people share in the mission of the Church because of their baptism. The priests and religious do not own the mission of the Church.   

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE CONSECRATED PERSONS AND THE LAITY

The teaching of the church as a communion had brought about a growth in the awareness that the members can and must unite their efforts in cooperation and exchange of gifts, for an effective participation in the mission of the church. This renders an effective response to the great challenge of our time. The laity are therefore invited to share more intensely in the spirituality and mission of the consecrated persons.[2]

There are different types of consecrated lives: the active and contemplative. Thus there are different kinds of consecrated persons. This would imply that the mode of relationship between contemplative consecrated persons and the lay persons would be different from the kind of relationship possible between and active consecrated persons or consecrated persons of apostolic life and the lay persons. Thus the relationship with the contemplative consecrated person would be more on the spiritual realm, while the relationship with the active consecrated person would be more on the apostolic and pastoral realm. However, irrespective of whatever state, the charism of the consecrated persons can and should be shared with the lay persons.

Collaboration and compatibility between the consecrated persons and the laity are essential for effective evangelization. However to foster an effective collaborative relationship between the consecrated persons and the laity, the consecrated persons need to step away from their hierarchical beliefs and see the lay people as an equal and a collaborative partner in the mission of the church. A shared sense of mission should be established. This relationship is very important because the consecrated person and the lay person have a distinct contribution to the mission of the church which essentially would be realized through collaboration between the two persons.

 The laity are not left out in the church, they constitute a central and important part of the church too. In his apostolic exhortation Christifideles Laici, John Paul II states clearly the model of the church and the relationship between the consecrated persons and the laity. Thus In Church Communion the states of life by being ordered one to the other are thus bound together among themselves. They all share in a deeply basic meaning: that of being the manner of living out the commonly shared Christian dignity and the universal call to holiness in the perfection of love. They are different yet complementary, in the sense that each of them has a basic and unmistakable character which sets each apart, while at the same time each of them is seen in relation to the other and placed at each other's service[3]

There is a necessity for a relationship; mutual collaboration between the consecrated persons and the laity. This is basically to bring more effectiveness to the mission of the church and to avoid passivity of the laity in ecclesiastical life. The Vatican II council in its definition of the church as the people of God justifies the oneness of the church and brought to light the dignity common to all the members of the Christian faithful and the vocation of all to perfection and holiness of life. Both the consecrated person and the lay persons need each other because we all form a single body within the church and are to be at the service of each other.

In the course of history, alongside different forms of consecrated life there have always been groups of lay people, men and women who manifested special interest to share in foundational charisms of the consecrated person and they have also contributed and supported the consecrated state of life. This relationship has grown and evolved following the inspirations and ordinances of the second Vatican council. However historical changes and evolvements have also affected the activities of the consecrated person; the consecrated persons need the help and cooperation of lay people in their mission. This quest for a mutual relationship merits consideration.

The oneness of the church is perfectly exemplified by the love and unity which binds the Trinitarian God and this same unity is what is expected of the people of God irrespective of what state of life one lives. The Trinitarian Model of communion necessitates the relationship between all the faithful, and thus also the relationship between the consecrated persons and the laity.

BASIS FOR THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE CONSECRATED PERSONS AND THE LAITY

There are some foundational reasons that characterize and prepared the bedrock for the relationship between the consecrated persons and the laity. This basis can be characterized under the followings:

v     Communal relationship of the consecrated persons and the laity as a fundamental perspective: The laity are considered to be co-responsible for the charismatic inspiration of the Christian mission. Here the knowledge and commitment to the charism of the consecrated persons are demanded of the laity. However, when a lay person takes up a vocation of service in collaboration with the consecrated persons, he or she make a conscious decision to belong to that particular charismatic family; sharing the same charism and therefore are co-responsible for the success of the mission. Beyond the dimensions of the Christian mission, individual charism of the lay person matters.

v     Free choice of lay people for ecclesiological reasons: here the faithful takes up a strong commitment to the ongoing development of apostolates, giving a Christian witness with a vocational sense, and striking a balance between their lives and their values. However, here the lay persons need to be better acquainted with the charismatic inspiration on which the specific apostolate was founded. Sometimes, a formation in spirituality and charism maybe organized.

v     Involvement and relationship as a result of changing circumstances:  here the faithful are invited to contribute and cooperate to the apostolic works decided on by the different institutes to attain specific objectives. However, the lay person here need to acquire the professional competence required, and are to equally live lives that conform to the principles of Christian faith.

BASIC REASONS FOR RELIGIOUS AND LAY RELATIONSHIP

v  For a renewed spiritual and apostolic dynamism

v  For the purpose of fostering unity of the different persons in the church

CONCLUSION: John Paul II expressed this well in his apostolic exhortation Vita Consecrata (1996): Today, often as a result of new situations, many Institutes have come to the conclusion that their charism can be shared with the laity. The laity are therefore invited to share more intensely in the spirituality and mission of these Institutes. We may say that, in the light of certain historical experiences such as those of the Secular or Third Orders, a new chapter, rich in hope, has begun in the history of relations between consecrated persons and the laity.[4] The participation of the laity often brings unexpected and rich insights into certain aspects of the charism, leading to a more spiritual interpretation of it and helping to draw from it directions for new activities in the apostolate.[5]

At times in the recent past, collaboration came about as a means of supplementing the decline of consecrated persons necessary to carry out activities, now it is growing out of the need to share responsibility not only in the carrying out of the Institute's works but especially in the hope of sharing specific aspects and moments of the spirituality and mission of the Institute. This calls for an adequate formation of both consecrated persons and laity to ensure a collaboration which is mutually enriching. When the understanding of the charism deepens, new possibilities of living it are discovered.



[1]
[2] Vc 54
[3] CL, 55.3
[4] VC, 54.2
[5] VC, 55.2

MY UNDERSTANDING OF FAITH IN ALLAH AND ZAKAT OF THE ISLAMIC RELIGION


NAME: MUOGBO MICHAEL

MATRIC NO.: SSPP/THEO/18/0734

COURSE: INTRODUCTION TO ISLAM

LECTURER: DR. WOLE ABBAS

TOPIC: MY UNDERSTANDING OF FAITH IN ALLAH AND ZAKAT OF THE ISLAMIC RELIGION



INTRODUCTION

Every Muslim ought to know and understand the five pillars of Islam, because the religious life of a Muslim revolves around them. They are the essence and the foundation of a Muslim’s entire life. They are the basic knowledge a typical Muslim ought to have.

MY UNDERSTANDING OF BELIEF IN ALLAH CALLED FAITH (IMAM)

Faith is the first principle in all religions. The Imam encapsulates the whole and especially the most basic and primary purpose and obligation of a Muslim. It is a necessary condition for one to believe, irrespective of what religion he or she belongs to. The Islamic belief in Allah is in no way different from the Christian belief in God. Imam, which is the belief or faith in Allah, is a necessary and primary condition for one to be a Muslim. The doctrine about God in the Qur’an is rigorously monotheistic: God is one and unique; he has no partner and no equal.

With my interactions with Islamic religion, my understanding of Imam is a total and unconditional belief in the supremacy of Allah, his existence and his power, irrespective of the fact that Allah is invisible. Faith in Allah is the first foundation of Islam. Allah is the name Muslims use for the supreme and unique God, who created and rules everything. The heart of faith for all Muslims is belief in Allah and obedience to His will. Faith in Allah presupposes unity with him.

However, there are six major articles of faith in the Islamic religion. These articles include: belief in the existence of God, Belief in angels, belief in the prophets, belief in the holy books, belief in the Day of Judgment and belief in destiny.

·         Belief in the existence of God: the existence of God is evident in our environment, All Muslims believe that God is one alone: There is only one God, God has no children, no parents, and no partners, God was not created by a being, There are no equal, superior, or lesser Gods.

·         Belief in angels: this is also a requirement of faith in the Islamic religion. Angels are believed in Islam to be spiritual beings created by Allah to obey him and carry out his will; they are messengers of Allah. They are different from human beings; neither male nor female, but they are more than human beings in number. It is believed in Islam that everybody has two angels to him or her. They are principal arch angels which include: Jibril who is in charge of divine messages, Asrail who is in charge of death, Israfil who bows the trumpet when the end comes, Mikail who is in charge of rain, Munkar and Nakir who awaits the dead in the grave, Ridwan who is in charge of Paradise, and Malik who is in charge of hell.

·         Belief in the prophets: the prophets are to be believed and revered by all Muslims. This is because Allah raised them by himself, to send messages and warnings to the people through them. Thus they are human being through whom Allah sends his words to the people. Some of the prophets include: Nuh, Ibrahim, Musa, Isa, Daud, and Mohammad. No distinction is to be made among these prophets and all of them are to be believed. Mohammad is believed in Islam to be the greatest and the seal of all the prophets.

·         Belief in the holy books: Muslims believe that Allah revealed His laws in stages to mankind through His prophets. The different prophets were sent with different books e.g. Ibrahim was sent with Suhf, Moses was sent with Tawrat, Isa was sent with Injil, Daud was sent with Sabur, and Mohammad was sent with Qur’an. The messages of the whole books sent through the different prophets were culminated in the Qur’an.

·         Belief in the Day of Judgment: this is one of the most emphasized beliefs in the Qur’an. This belief emphasizes the fact that human beings are mortals and will die someday and are accountable to Allah. It is taught in Islam that physical death is not the end of man’s existence, but an entrance to a higher form of life which brings one closer to Allah depending on how one has lived this life. On the Day of Judgment, each soul will be rewarded according to what it earned.

·         Belief in destiny: this is a belief on the primary purpose of one’s life. The primary aim of everyone’s life is to worship Allah. This is because worship is a necessary and primary allegiance a Muslim owes to Allah.

THE INSTITUTION OF ZAKAT IN ISLAM AND ITS BENEFITS

Everything in this universe belongs to Allah, including the wealth that most people have a hard time giving out a portion for charity. According to the Encarta dictionary, Zakat is an Islamic tax for charity; a tax that goes to charity, obligatory for all Muslims, se traditionally at 2.5 percent of somebody’s annual income and capital.[1]

            Zakat is a religious obligation of the Islamic religion which involves arms giving. Thus, Zakat is the most prominent concept in the Islamic tradition commanding and authorizing practices of giving in voluntariness. It is one of the most important pillars of Islam. It is mandatory for every Muslim who is financially stable and it is seen as an act of worship which directly benefits the less privileged Muslims. This is to ensure the distribution of wealth.

Zakat is an Arabic word meaning purification and growth. It has a very deeply ingrained religious, personal and social humanitarian value. This act helps to prevent the hoarding of wealth and promotes solidarity and unity amongst Muslims. Zakat payment is 2.5 percent on annual savings that are measurable and 20 percent of a treasure (Bassam Imam, Islam in brief p. 28). This is only required of adults whose income and wealth are up to the level of the minimum net worth of an individual which obligates him or her to pay zakat. It is levied on five categories of property: food grains; fruit; camels, cattle, sheep, and goats; gold and silver; and movable goods and is payable each year after one year's possession.[2]

The Zakat is the third pillar of Islam; it aims at moderation in order to make sure that the needs of the less privileged Muslims are met. However there are sets of people to whom the zakat is tended, these people can be referred to as the beneficiaries of Zakat. They include:

·         The poor: these are the ones living in and below the poverty line and are in need.

·         The needy:  (the unemployed, sacked),

·         The newly converted,

·         Those in bondage,

·         Those in debts,

·         Wayfarers (stranded travelers),

·         Those in the cause of Allah.

·         For obtaining the freedom of those who are captives or enslaved.

Zakat as an Islamic institution is not a voluntary charity but an obligation. However, after the breakup of Muslim religio-political power, payment of zakat became a matter of voluntary charity dependent on individual conscience. In the modern Muslim world it has been left up to the individual, except in some countries (such as Saudi Arabia) where the Shariah (Islamic law) is strictly maintained.[3]

BENEFITS OF ZAKAT

·         It makes one reach the rank of the perfect believer.

·         It is one of the causes of entering Paradise.

·         It makes the Islamic society a single family in which the strong helps the weak and the rich helps the poor.

·         It expands the breast with assurance and gladdens the heart.

·         It is proof of the truthfulness of the faith of he who gives Zakat.

·         It prevents financial crimes such as robbery and stealing.

·         It makes the rest of one's wealth religiously and legally pure.



[1] Microsoft® Encarta® 2009. © 1993-2008 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
[2] zakat." Encyclopædia Britannica. Encyclopædia Britannica Ultimate Reference Suite.  Chicago: Encyclopædia Britannica, 2014.
[3] "Islam." Encyclopædia Britannica. Encyclopædia Britannica Ultimate Reference Suite.  Chicago: Encyclopædia Britannica, 2014.

THE MESSIANIC SECRET IN THE GOSPEL ACCORDING TO MARK


INTRODUCTION

Reading the Gospel according to Mark, one feels Mark is fairly bursting with the good news of Jesus Christ the son of God, crucified and risen from death. Obvious in Mark’s introduction is the fact that that Jesus is the Son of God. The most striking feature of the Gospel according to mark is the theme of the messianic secret. This is a theme which raises the fundamental question of the identity of Jesus. Thus, why did Jesus forbid his identity to be revealed? This paper will focus on elaborating the theme of the messianic secret as in the gospel according to Mark; what it is, its proponents and opponents.

WHAT IS THE MESSIANIC SECRETS?

The messianic secret is a theme in the gospel according to Mark which speaks of Jesus’ insistence on concealing his identity and mighty works during the time of his public ministry. It is a theme which sprang from biblical criticism, expressing Jesus’ repeated desire to remain unpublicized during the time of his ministry here on earth. This insistence of Jesus forbids both demons and people from revealing His identity. Some of these instances can be seen in Mark 1:25, 34, 3:12 and Mark 8:30 respectively. Why did Jesus forbid that his identity should be revealed? Why would he want them to keep this stunning revelation to themselves?

 A clue to this puzzle is revealed in Peter’s confession or profession of faith. Jesus’ messianic identity enclosed a deeper mystery more than any of the apostles or even his followers could understand. However, this mystery was unveiled gradually when Jesus completes the first part of his ministry, his Galilean mission which consists mostly of his deeds. However, before He begins his Jerusalem ministry, which will highlight his passion and death, He wishes to clarify his identity with his disciples. Peter’s confession of Jesus as the messiah is apparently correct, but Peter still thinks of him merely as a miracle working messiah and a person of grandeur. That has been the traditional concept of the messiah. Jesus’ response, surprisingly, is a stern injunction to silence.[1] He prohibiting them not to reveal his identity makes it clear that this title can only be misleading until people have experienced his passion, death and resurrection. Thus the Messiahship of Christ is complete only in his cross and death. Since the disciples did not yet comprehend the true nature of Jesus messiahship, Jesus would not allow them to interpret it in the light of their own earthly understanding and expectation. However, the second part of the gospel according to mark makes the identity of Jesus clearer.[2]

            The popular expectation of the messiah is one who would exercise a political and military dominance, who would liberate Israel from Roman domination and bring back peace and progress. However, the mission of Jesus is far beyond that. The messiahship of Jesus transcends all Jewish expectations. Jesus had come to bring a greater liberation from the shackles of Satan, sin and death. This mission is necessarily linked to his sacrificial death, being obedient even unto death on a cross. The gradual disclosure of the messianic secret has to happen for every Christian, as we learn from Jesus the paradox of the cross. The warrant of the messianic secret is thus: until the mystery of the messianic identity is revealed, there is a fundamental risk that sensational reports about the miracles of Jesus would generate a false and distorted messianic enthusiasm[3] as the one Jesus escaped in the gospel according to John 6: 15 where the people forcefully want to take him and make him a king.

            Nonetheless, there is a striking contrast to the messianic secret, which made of an exorcised man the first Christian missionary to the people of the gentile nations (Mark 5: 19), where Jesus told a man he delivered from demonic possession, who had asked to remain with him, to “go home to your people and tell them how much the Lord has done for you and how he has had mercy on you” (Mark 5:19). This is to say that Jesus’ rejection of the Man’s request is rather a commissioning. However it is arguable that the man is not asked to proclaim the identity of Jesus, but rather what Jesus did for him. Jesus use of the word “the Lord” (ho Kyrios) in place of his own name is a veiled reference to his divinity.[4]

The miracles of Jesus point to the truth of his messianic identity; however, they are only part of the truth. This is thus the reason for Jesus’ insistence that his identity remain unrevealed until after his resurrection as he instructed the apostles after his transfiguration.

SOME INSTANCES THAT IMPLIED THE MESSIANIC SECRET

Instances of the messianic secret are spread all through the gospel of mark. Some of these instances are: Mark 1:44 after Jesus had, out of pity, healed a leper who requested his healing at his (Jesus’) own will. However, as Jesus sent him away, He sternly warned him not to tell anyone about it. This is the first clear instance of what the biblical scholars call the messianic secret. Also in Mark 5:43 after Jesus had resurrected twelve years old Jairus’ daughter, He strictly ordered that no one should know about it. Another instance is on Mark 7:36 after Jesus healed the deaf and dumb man; He ordered that they should not tell anyone. However, here it was not portrayed that Jesus succeeded in stopping the people from proclaiming, because the people were completely astonished. Yet another instance is Mark 8: 26, here the messianic secret is implied when after curing a blind man, Jesus sends the man home and asks that he never return to the village. It is implied here because, had the man stayed back in the village, the people would recognized him as the once blind man and would inquire how he got to regain his sight which would warrant the man to expose the identity of Jesus. Also in Mark 9:9 after the glory of Jesus was manifested on the mount Tabor and the three apostles present had a glimpse of his divinity, when they got down from the mountain Jesus ordered the disciples not to tell anyone what they had seen, until the Son of man had risen from the dead. The condition for the proclamation of his identity as given by Jesus reemphasizes the point that His messianic identity would not be properly understood until he had embraced and conquered death. A classical passage of the messianic secret is Mark 8: 29-30, the scene at Caesarea Philippi where Peter confessed Jesus as the messiah.

Nevertheless Jesus also rebuked demons from revealing his identity, these instances are particularly seen in Mark 1:25 here Jesus had ordered an evil spirit to be silent and come out of the man it possessed after it had proclaimed that Jesus is the holy one of God. Also in Mark 1:34 it is recounted that Jesus drove out many demons; but never allowed them to speak because they know who he was. Here the reason given by Mark why Jesus did not allow the demons to speak stands as a strong argument for the affirmation of the messianic secret. In Mark 3:12 Jesus had also warned that no one should be told who he was.

THE PROPONENT OF THE MESSIANIC SECRET

            The first proponent of the messianic secret is a German Lutheran theologian named Wilhelm Wrede who proposed that Jesus was consciously hiding his identity from His enemies by commanding the disciples to keep silent about his miracles. Wrede demonstrates that Mark’s gospel portrays Jesus as someone who rejects messianic claims in an enigmatic method.

            However, he sought to substantiate his charge that the portrayal of the messianic consciousness of Jesus by Biblical scholars exemplified by Oscar Holtzmann cannot be established from Mark. According to Wrede the search for a development of Jesus’ messianic consciousness is based upon a misconception, for Mark simply does not answer the questions which must be answered if such a development is to be traced. Wrede brought forth some question whose answer Mark didn’t provide. Some of the questions are: on what account does Jesus continually forbid people to speak of his messianic dignity and miracles? On what account does he keep silent over and against the disciples?[5] Wrede went on to say that Jesus wishing the disciples to arrive at the right attitude towards him on their own is neither hinted nor self-evident in Mark; however, on what account is the secret still to be kept from the people after Peter confessed that Jesus is the Christ of God in Caesarea Philippi? Nonetheless, a very outrageous claim of Wrede is that Jesus never thinks of himself as the messiah of divine.

THE OPPONENT OF MESSIANIC SECRET

            Scholarship has provided insurmountable problems that destroy Wrede’s hypothesis and leave it insufficient for the position its arguing for. These are the people who argue for messianic consciousness. Basically the opponents are scholars who initially respond in opposition to Wrede’s submission. One of the outstanding critics of Wrede’s position is William Sanday, an oxford professor who championed the positions of the radical Historicism. Sanday in his argument says that Wrede’s position is exceptionally in error. He characterized Wrede’s writing style like that of a “Prussian Office”[6], making it utterly superficial and impossible.[7] However, another opponent is Albert Schweitzer who holds that Jesus is aware and understood his messianic call, but enigmatically veiled it under the title, “Son of man.”  He goes on to say that Jesus kept his awareness a mystery, only gradually revealing it.  This led to Peter’s confession and ultimately to his own confession before the High Priest. Both William Sanday and Albert Schweitzer reactions to William Wrede’s messianic secret was characterized by attempts to reclaim historical grounds for describing the life of Jesus.

EVALUATION

If difficulties arise because of what Mark does not say, they also arise because of what he does say. Although, sometimes Jesus enjoins silence upon the people whom he heal, at other times he perform miracles in the full glare of publicity.[8] However, if the son of man means the messiah, then following the events of Mark 2:10 and 2:28 it would mean Jesus has long designated and revealed his identity before Peter’s confession. Jesus enjoining his three apostles to keep quiet about what they saw during the transfiguration till after his resurrection throws more light to his parable of the Lamp in Mark 4:21-23. This however, would imply that the Messiahship of Jesus as Mark had constructed his gospel is designed to be a secret throughout his earthly ministry and is to be made known after his resurrection.

CONCLUSION

However, as a researcher, I conclude that the messianic secret is a theological idea that resulted out of biblical criticism and not Mark’s invention. Jesus as the Christ Performed miracle; an evidence of His Messiahship, but then enjoins the witnesses to keep silent about it. If the miracles of Jesus are evidences of his Messiahship, why does he hide it? The controversy of the messianic secret is still very debatable.





BIBLIOGRAPHY

BROWN RAYMOND, An Introduction to the New Testament, Theological Publication, Bangalore 2014.

HEALY MARY, The Gospel of Mark, Baker Academic, Washington 2008.

SANDAY WILLIAMS, The Life of Christ in Recent Research, Oxford University Press, New York 1907.

WILLIAMS WREDE, The Messianic Secret, trans. J. C. G. Grieg, James Clarke & Co., Cambridge 1971.

The New community Bible, St Paul Publications, Ibadan 2013.



[1] M. HEALY, The Gospel of Mark, Baker Academic, Washington 2008, 163.
[2] The New community Bible: Commentary on Mark 8:27-30, St Paul Publications, Ibadan 2013.
[3] M. HEALY, The Gospel of Mark, Baker Academic, Washington 2008, 53.
[4] M. HEALY, The Gospel of Mark, Baker Academic, Washington 2008, 103.
[5] W. WREDE, The Messianic Secret, trans. J. C. G. Grieg , James Clarke & Co., Cambridge 1971, 15.
[6] W. Sanday, The Life of Christ in Recent Research , Oxford University Press,  New York  1907, 70.
[7] Ibid. 74.
[8] W. WREDE, The Messianic Secret, trans. J. C. G. Grieg , James Clarke & Co., Cambridge 1971, 17.